Histological features of scar tissue formation in different methods of postoperative wound closure
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

skin
scars
postoperative stage
morphological and morphometric methods
regeneration

How to Cite

Zhurakovska , H., & Savosko , S. (2022). Histological features of scar tissue formation in different methods of postoperative wound closure. Medicine Today and Tomorrow, 91(2), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.35339/msz.2022.91.2.zhs

Abstract

Scar tissue formation is a natural reaction to a violation of the integrity of body tissues, including after any surgical procedure. The main role in wound reparative histogenesis occurs due to the growth of connective tissue, the cells of which begin to healing processes belongs to the connective tissue. A big role in wound healing processes belongs to the connective tissue, which cells have an extremely high reactivity, grow, from both edges of the wound, towards each other and fasten the edges of the wound with their fibers, which in turn become stronger (they are sclerosed) and form a dense scar. Factors such as heredity, the state of the immune system, the patient's age, the presence of concomitant diseases, and many others have a great influence on the healing of the postoperative wound and the formation of scar tissue. Also, intraoperative methods of influence on wound healing such as a method of wound closure, drainage, hemostasis, debridement, influence on wound infection, etc., are undoubtedly very important. An experimental study was conducted to study and compare the histological changes of scar tissue in some options for closing the postoperative wound at the early postoperative stage. 60 animals were operated on, that were divided into 5 groups: one control and 4 experimental. They compared the methods of closing surgical wounds using the methods of suturing the wound with knotted sutures, intradermal suture, gluing the edges of the wound and using the method of electrowelding of tissues. The results of the histological examination showed equal effectiveness of the compared methods of closing the postoperative wound, with a tendency for faster development of the connective tissue of the dermis in the group in which electric welding was used.

Keywords: skin, scars, postoperative stage, morphological and morphometric methods, regeneration.

https://doi.org/10.35339/msz.2022.91.2.zhs
PDF (Українська)

References

Nahaichuk VV, Shkilniak LI. Osoblyvosti diahnostyky, likuvannia i profilaktyky patolohichnykh rubtsiv shchelepno-lytsevoi dilianky. Ukrainskyi stomatolohichnyi almanakh [Features of diagnosis, treatment and prevention of pathological scars of the maxillofacial area. Ukrainian dental almanac]. 2017; (2):74-7. Available at: https://is.gd/ZagVsG [in Ukrainian].

Melnychuk YuN, Ohonovsky RZ. Evaluation of the dynamic of the local temperature of facial skin scars with contact thermometry. Bukovinian Medical Herald. 2015;19(2(74)):133-7. DOI: 10.24061/2413-0737.XIX.2.74.2015.95. [In Ukrainian].

Kharkov LV, Mochalov YuO, Klymenko PP, Kiseliova NV. Pathomorphological Features of Atrophic Post-surgery Skin Scars of the Middle Part of the Child Face. Novyny stomatolohii [Dentistry news]. 2011;(3):70-6. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Ns_2011_3_17 [in Ukrainian].

Toropov OA, Avetikov DS, Lokes KP, Steblovskyi DV, Skrypnyk VM, Prykhidko RA. The use of cryoconservated placenta for prevention of pathologic scar formation of the head and neck at the intra- and postoperative stage in planned surgery. Ukrainian Dental Almanac. 2020;(2):74-80. DOI: 10.31718/2409-0255.2.2020.12. [In Ukrainian].

Avetikov DS, Trapova HO. Current aspects of the pathogenesis and prevention of the formation of pathological scars. Bulletin of problems biology and medicine. 2014;107(2-1):44-7. Available at: https://vpbm.com.ua/ua/vpbm-2014-02-1/5760 [in Ukrainian].

Avetikov DS, Trapova KO. Advantages and disadvantages of present methods to prevent the formation of pathological scars. Actual problems of modern medicine: Bulletin of the Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy. 2013;13(3(43)):10-2. Available at: https://www.pdmu.edu.ua/old/journal/journal2/pdf/mag2/2013n43_3.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Bardova EA. Some aspects of scarring treatment. Dermatology and venereology. 2015;67(1):55-62. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/dtv_2015_1_8 [in Ukrainian].

Zoltan Ya. Operative technique and conditions for optimal wound healing. Hungary, Budapest: CicatrixOptima; Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of Hungary; 1974. 219 p.

Penoff J. Skin closures using cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives. Plastic Surgery Educational Foundation DATA Committee. Device and Technique Assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103(2):730-1. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199902000-00061. PMID: 9950569.

Scott GR, Carson CL, Borah GL. Dermabond skin closures for bilateral reduction mammaplasties: a review of 255 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(6):1460-5. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000282032.05203.8b. PMID: 18040174.

Chang JW, Cho KS, Heo W, Lee JH. (CONSORT) Wound closure using Dermabond after excision of hemangioma on the lip. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(17):e15342. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015342. PMID: 31027109.

Ito M, Liu Y, Yang Z, Nguyen J, Liang F, Morris RJ, Cotsarelis G. Stem cells in the hair follicle bulge contribute to wound repair but not to homeostasis of the epidermis. Nat Med. 2005;11(12):1351-4. DOI: 10.1038/nm1328. PMID: 16288281.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.