Surgical treatment of acute complicated duodenal ulcers
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

perforation
bleeding
stenosis
penetration
vagotomy
gastric resection

How to Cite

Ivanchov , P., & Biliachenko , M. (2023). Surgical treatment of acute complicated duodenal ulcers. Medicine Today and Tomorrow, 92(3), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.35339/msz.2023.92.3.ivb

Abstract

Complications of peptic ulcer of the stomach and duodenum are an integral part of urgent abdominal surgery. This especially applies to complications of duodenal ulcers (DU), which, in turn, is associated with a combination of several complications and problems with the choice of surgical tactics for their treatment. This is supported by postoperative mortality rates, which remain high and range from 15.0% to 68.0% according to various sources. The aim was to improve the results of treatment of complicated duodenal ulcers. The results of the analysis of surgical treatment of acutely complicated duodenal ulcers (combination of 3 and/or 4 combined complications) for 2 periods are presented: 1st – from 2000 to 2014 (group A) – 69 patients; 2nd – from 2015 to 2022 (group B) – 50 patients. 119 (100.0%) patients were operated on for complicated duodenal ulcers, of which 101 (84.9%) patients had a combination of three complications, and 18 (15.1%) – four complications. Out of 119 patients, 106 (89.1%) had bleeding complications. Complications of ulcer perforation in 53 (44.5%). Based on the obtained analysis data, there is a steady trend towards an increase in the rate of organ-preserving operations by 1.62 times (from 50.7% to 82%), a decrease in the number of gastric resections by 2.7 times (from 15.9 % to 6%). The number of performed organ-sparing operations was relatively stable: in group A – 15 (21.7%), in group B – 10 (20%). The use of modern measures of endoscopic hemostasis made it possible to implement a system of preparing patients for surgery, to operate on patients in the early delayed period, and their share from the first period to the second increased by 3.2 times (from 5.7% to 18.3%). The number of patients who underwent emergency surgery with ulcer perforation and bleeding as combined complications decreased in the second period compared to the first by 2.8 times, which is associated with the widespread use of mo­dern proton pump inhibitors in the conservative treatment of DU. Actively individualized tactics and the use of developed algorithms for choosing the type of surgical intervention made it possible to reduce the mortality rate by almost 2 times: from 16.8% in the first period (group A) to 8.9% in the second period (group B).

Keywords: perforation, bleeding, stenosis, penetration, vagotomy, gastric resection.

https://doi.org/10.35339/msz.2023.92.3.ivb
PDF (Українська)

References

Dunlap JJ, Patterson S. Peptic ulcer disease. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2019;42(5):451–4. DOI: 10.1097/sga.0000000000000478. PMID: 31574075.

The PEPTIC Investigators for the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group, Alberta Health Services Critical Care Strategic Clinical Network, and the Irish Critical Care Trials Group, Young PJ, Bagshaw SM, Forbes AB, Nichol AD, Wright SE, et al. Effect of stress ulcer prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors vs histamine-2 receptor blockers on in-hospital mortality among ICU patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation: The PEPTIC randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;323(7):616. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.22190. PMID: 31950977.

Savarino V, Mela GS, Zentilin P, Mele MR, Lapertosa L, Patetta R, et al. Circadian gastric acidity in Helicobacter pylori positive ulcer patients with and without gastric metaplasia in the duodenum. Gut. 1996;39(4):508-12. DOI: 10.1136/gut.39.4.508. PMID: 8944557.

Milosavljevic T, Kostic-Milosavljevic M, Jovanovic I, Krstic M. Complications of peptic ulcer disease. Dig Dis. 2011;29(5):491-3. DOI: 10.1159/000331517. PMID: 22095016.

Kozlov SN. An assessment of the prognostic criteria for early recurrences of peptic hemorrhage. Lik Sprava. 1998;137-9. PMID: 9621640.

Zhu C, Badach J, Lin A, Mathur N, McHugh S, Saracco B, et al. Omental patch versus gastric resection for perforated gastric ulcer: Systematic review and meta-analysis for an unresolved debate. Am J Surg. 2021;221(5):935-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.07.039. PMID: 32943177.

Guzel H, Kahramanca S, Seker D, Ozgehan G, Tunc G, Kucukpinar T, et al. Peptic ulcer complications requiring surgery: What has changed in the last 50 years in Turkey. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2014;25(2):152-5. DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2014.5526. PMID: 25003674.

Salman MA, Issa M, Salman A, Tourky M, Elewa A, Alrahawy M, et al. Surgical management of perforated peptic ulcer: A comparative meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2022;32(5):586-94. DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001086. PMID: 36044274.

Sekiguchi H, Shinozaki S, Takezawa T, Osawa H, Miura Y, Lefor AK, et al. Long-term outcomes in patients with post-bulbar ulcer bleeding compared to bulbar ulcer bleeding in the duodenum. Digestion. 2022;103(2):126-32. DOI: 10.1159/000519293. PMID: 34551417.

Recurrent bleeding from a duodenal ulcer halted by laparoscopic oversewing under endoscopic guidance. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2022;32(08):S121-3. DOI: 10.29271/jcpsp.2022.supp2.s121. PMID: 36210668.

Ng EKW, Chung SCS, Lau JTF, Sung JJY, Leung JWC, Raimes SA, et al. Risk of further ulcer complications after an episode of peptic ulcer bleeding. Br J Surg. 2005;83(6):840-4. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800830635. PMID: 8696756.

Jamal MH, Karam A, Alsharqawi N, Buhamra A, AlBader I, Al-Abbad J, et al. Laparoscopy in acute care surgery: Repair of perforated duodenal ulcer. Med Princ Pract. 2019;28(5):442-8. DOI: 10.1159/000500107. PMID: 30995637

Marques P. Gastric ulcer with penetration and abscess in the liver. J Belg Soc Radiol. 2022;106(1). DOI: 10.5334/jbsr.2683. PMID: 35291557.

Dias E, Cardoso H, Costa C, Macedo G. Gastric ulcer with liver penetration. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2022;114(4):248-9. DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8528/2021. PMID: 35000403.

Pescarus R. Third-space endoscopy to the rescue: what is the role of gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy in the management of gastric sleeve stenosis? Endoscopy. 2022;54(4):382-3. DOI: 10.1055/a-1669-8748. PMID: 34905792.

Malmi H, Kautiainen H, Virta LJ, Farkkila MA. Increased short- and long-term mortality in 8146 hospitalised peptic ulcer patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;44(3):234-45. DOI: 10.1111/apt.13682. PMID: 27240732.

Thorsen K, Soreide JA, Kvaloy JT, Glomsaker T, Soreide K. Epidemiology of perforated peptic ulcer: age- and gender-adjusted analysis of incidence and mortality. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(3):347-54. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i3.347. PMID: 23372356.

Clinch D, Damaskos D, Di Marzo F, Di Saverio S. Duodenal ulcer perforation: A systematic literature review and narrative description of surgical techniques used to treat large duodenal defects. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021;91(4):748-58. DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003357. PMID: 34254960.

Yen HH, Wu PY, Wu TL, Huang SP, Chen YY, Chen MF, et al. Forrest Classification for Bleeding Peptic Ulcer: A New Look at the Old Endoscopic Classification. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(5):1066. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051066. PMID: 35626222.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.